I am not sure I have ever seen a movie more opposed to the things I find valuable in cinema, or in art and entertainment in general, as “Deadpool & Wolverine.” The latest entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe seems to have been made by people who are less concerned with the quality of the finished product and more focused on cost reduction and production efficiency.
In their attempt to maximize the film’s cameo-to-runtime ratio, the filmmakers seem to have forgotten about every other aspect of filmmaking. Corners have been cut wherever possible, the shots are not so much edited as thrown together in a vaguely sequential manner, and the visual effects are overused and totally unconvincing.
The aesthetics of the movie were a huge disappointment, to say the least. While I may never be able to confirm this with the director, I assume that the lighting budget was cut in its entirety to ensure that Chris Evans received a paycheck, because every scene is lit as if it takes place inside a Walmart. The images are uninspired in composition and dull in color. Even the title characters’ vibrant red and yellow costumes look washed out.
The few times director Shawn Levy attempts any kind of image more expressive than a close-up is laughable. From what I have seen, Levy seems to simply borrow style from superior filmmakers who have used the same techniques more effectively and in better films. What Levy produces just feels hollow coming from him. None of the choices Levy made elevate the material, and they feel out of place and disconnected from the rest of the film.
Characters like Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine, Dafne Keen’s X-23 and Wesley Snipes’ Blade come across as not just lifeless, but dead. These returning characters feel more like pieces of intellectual property than people, defined not by emotions but by their status as familiar products being resold to an eager public.
Aside from the three previously mentioned, each character reintroduced in “Deadpool & Wolverine” originates from some maligned relic of the early 2000s, pre-MCU superhero craze. While this is a “Deadpool” movie — meaning there are, of course, a few jabs at the characters’ historical insignificance — these snarky moments are overridden by the movie’s attempts to valorize them and turn previously failed characters into gods.
“Deadpool & Wolverine” is, above all else, insulting. It is a movie that presupposes that its audience will not care that it fails to meet the most basic standards of competence we should expect from a movie as long as it supplies us with an endless stream of recognizable things.
Perhaps the most maddening thing about it is that had the filmmakers handled the movie with even a modicum of care or respect for their craft, it would be infinitely better. Instead of evoking emotion and entertainment through well-crafted filmmaking and clever writing, “Deadpool & Wolverine” takes the easier, dumber path and bludgeons the viewer with an onslaught of content until we are forced into resigned submission.
Nate • Aug 12, 2024 at 2:01 pm
I completely agree with your take on Levy’s poor execution in terms of both camera work and lighting. After binging Deadpool 1 and 2 before watching Deadpool & Wolverine, the plots in comparison are absolutely laughable. Deadpool and Wolverine actively punishes its audience members who are caught up on FoX-Men, MCU, and Deadpool with its disorienting and nonsensical plot. Why does deadpool get plucked to save his respective timeline? Why is the void not constantly moving or being eroded like in Loki? Actually I personally enjoyed many of the jokes in the film, but good lord every f*** that comes out of Hugh’s mouth seems so damn forced! I’d blame the writer’s, not him. This movie screams writer’s strike, with no development for any character (pity attempt for this movie’s Wolverine). The Wolverine vs. Deadpool fights and Chris Evans comedic reveal as the Human Torch were definitely the highlights of the film. However, compared to the plot driven yet comedic films of deadpool 1 and 2, Levy’s contribution to the franchise is extremely distasteful and disappointing.
Duat • Aug 11, 2024 at 9:44 am
This person sounds like she thinks the Star Wars Acolyte is a piece of literary art.
Jennifer • Aug 10, 2024 at 12:07 pm
Wow. I kinda feel about your review what you feel about the film. Funny how that works.
Angela • Aug 10, 2024 at 6:15 am
Now I know that anything else you ever write is gonna be total drivel.
Nate • Aug 12, 2024 at 2:04 pm
Why when people like you disagree, they do not state a point to be discussed against? Instead, they attack the writer himself rather than his argument or opinion. Thanks Angela! Very helpful and insightful!
Jacob • Aug 13, 2024 at 8:26 am
It’s because the writer of the post clearly ignored the most obvious part here. Deadpool was never really about the plot, it’s always been built on the characters and their interactions. I didn’t like the plot all that much, but the truth is it doesn’t matter, and audiences knew that going in. The author has just gone in with the wrong expectations, and ignores the fact that Deadpool isn’t supposed to be a serious movie. If Deadpool had a good plot, with proper character arcs and cohesive story, it would be worse because it would be just like all the other dribble out there that marvel has been pumping out. The beauty is in the chaos, and if the author can’t appreciate that, that’s his problem, not the movies. Frankly, it’s unprofessional to compare a movie to your standards, rather than comparing it to what it was made to be, which it succeeds at.
Balls Tate • Nov 16, 2024 at 3:19 am
Because his argument is just a list of grievances, rather than a critique. They simply list things they don’t like about the movie without discussing what’s wrong with them. The lighting? What was wrong with the lighting? It seemed like a professionally lit movie set. Do you know how hard it is to film action scenes in a way where they read to audiences? If not, watch a Transformers movie and compare it to this. Do you know how much harder it is when you don’t have a good handle on lighting? This review reads like a lot of boo-hooing from someone who went in with preconceptions they worked backwards to arrive upon.